Screener
QIG vs CRUX
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund vs Columbia Core Bond ETF
Key differences
Both QIG and CRUX are fixed income ETFs. QIG charges 0.18% a year and CRUX 0.32%. The main difference: QIG follows a index tracking strategy; CRUX uses active selection.
- QIG follows a index tracking strategy; CRUX uses active selection.
- QIG costs 0.14% less per year.
- CRUX is much larger than QIG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CRUX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QIG | CRUX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2016 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.86% | 4.12% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.37 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.15% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.92% | -1.86% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.