Screener
QLTA vs CLOX
iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF vs Eldridge AAA CLO ETF
Key differences
- QLTA costs 0.05% less per year.
- QLTA is significantly larger than CLOX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QLTA follows a index tracking strategy; CLOX uses active selection.
- QLTA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QLTA | CLOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $282M |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 5.05% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.21 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.44% | 1.35% |
| Max drawdown | -22.27% | -4.13% |
Similar to QLTA and CLOX
Explore further