Screener
QMFE vs BUFM
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February vs AB Moderate Buffer ETF
Key differences
- BUFM costs 0.21% less per year.
- BUFM is significantly larger than QMFE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| QMFE | BUFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $53M | $397M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.8% | +13.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.01% | 5.84% |
| Max drawdown | -11.76% | -9.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QMFE and BUFM
Explore further