Screener
QMOM vs IVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF vs Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
Key differences
- QMOM costs 0.10% less per year.
- QMOM follows a active selection strategy; IVAL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, QMOM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QMOM | IVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $519M | $207M |
| Since | 2015 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 2.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.2% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.1% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.09% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -39.13% | -46.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QMOM and IVAL
Explore further