Screener
QPX vs AOR
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOR costs 1.59% less per year.
- AOR is significantly larger than QPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | AOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2020 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.53% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 8.50% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -22.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and AOR
Explore further