Screener
QPX vs AOK
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOK costs 1.59% less per year.
- AOK is significantly larger than QPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AOK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | AOK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $756M |
| Since | 2020 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.32% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +13.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +4.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 5.80% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -18.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and AOK
Explore further