Screener
QPX vs CGBL
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Key differences
- CGBL costs 1.41% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than QPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $6.1B |
| Since | 2020 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.92% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 9.69% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -11.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and CGBL
Explore further