Screener
QPX vs DYTA
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF
Key differences
- DYTA costs 0.42% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | DYTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 1.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $96M |
| Since | 2020 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.59% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.98% | 9.63% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -9.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and DYTA
Explore further