Screener
QPX vs GAL
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 1.39% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than QPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QPX is classified as mixed asset, while GAL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- QPX follows a active selection strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $307M |
| Since | 2020 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.98% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -28.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and GAL
Explore further