Screener
QPX vs TUG
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs STF Tactical Growth ETF
Key differences
- TUG costs 1.09% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, TUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | TUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $42M |
| Since | 2020 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.98% | 16.15% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -22.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and TUG
Explore further