Screener
QPX vs GGM
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs GGM Macro Alignment ETF
Key differences
- GGM costs 0.80% less per year.
- QPX is classified as mixed asset, while GGM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | GGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.94% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $18M |
| Since | 2020 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +13.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.98% | 11.32% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -19.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and GGM
Explore further