Screener
QPX vs SPDF
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF
Key differences
- SPDF costs 1.05% less per year.
- QPX is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QPX is classified as mixed asset, while SPDF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QPX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | SPDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $5M |
| Since | 2020 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -1.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and SPDF
Explore further