Screener
QPX vs TUGN
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 1.09% less per year.
- QPX is classified as mixed asset, while TUGN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- QPX follows a active selection strategy; TUGN uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $78M |
| Since | 2020 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 11.46% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +35.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.98% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -23.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and TUGN
Explore further