Screener
QPX vs XRLX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs FundX Conservative ETF
Key differences
- XRLX costs 0.54% less per year.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | XRLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 1.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $51M |
| Since | 2020 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.68% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 8.13% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -15.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and XRLX
Explore further