Screener
QPX vs XNAV
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- XNAV costs 0.47% less per year.
- QPX is classified as mixed asset, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $31M |
| Since | 2020 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.98% | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and XNAV
Explore further