Screener
QQQH vs CSHI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF vs NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
Key differences
- CSHI costs 0.30% less per year.
- CSHI is significantly larger than QQQH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CSHI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QQQH | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $363M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2019 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 9.12% | 4.94% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.0% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -5.6% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.04 | 1.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.69% | 0.87% |
| Max drawdown | -53.25% | -1.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QQQH and CSHI
Explore further