Screener
QTAC vs FAAR
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
Key differences
- FAAR costs 0.80% less per year.
- FAAR is significantly larger than QTAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; FAAR uses long short.
- FAAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | FAAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $168M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 9.07% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.48% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -18.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and FAAR
Explore further