Screener
QTAC vs TUGN
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 1.13% less per year.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; TUGN uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $78M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 11.46% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +35.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -23.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and TUGN
Explore further