Screener
TUG vs QVOY
STF Tactical Growth ETF vs Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF
Key differences
- TUG costs 0.67% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, TUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUG | QVOY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 1.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $60M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 0.52% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.4% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | +12.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.15% | 17.44% |
| Max drawdown | -22.27% | -17.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUG and QVOY
Explore further