Screener
TUGN vs QVOY
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF vs Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 0.67% less per year.
- TUGN is classified as alternative, while QVOY is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- TUGN follows a option income strategy; QVOY uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TUGN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUGN | QVOY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 1.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $60M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 11.46% | 0.52% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.8% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.2% | +12.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 17.44% |
| Max drawdown | -23.45% | -17.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUGN and QVOY
Explore further