Screener
QTAC vs XNAV
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- XNAV costs 0.51% less per year.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $31M |
| Since | 2025 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and XNAV
Explore further