Screener
XNAV vs QVOY
FundX Aggressive ETF vs Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF
Key differences
- XNAV costs 0.05% less per year.
- XNAV is classified as alternative, while QVOY is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | QVOY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 1.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $60M |
| Since | 2002 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 0.52% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.5% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.0% | +12.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.54% | 17.56% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -17.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XNAV and QVOY
Explore further