Screener
QTJA vs TMFS
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- QTJA costs 0.06% less per year.
- TMFS is significantly larger than QTJA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTJA is classified as alternative, while TMFS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QTJA follows a structured outcome strategy; TMFS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, QTJA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTJA | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $64M |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +0.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 19.64% |
| Max drawdown | -36.09% | -48.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTJA and TMFS
Explore further