Screener
QTJL vs IUSG
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July vs iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
Key differences
- IUSG costs 0.75% less per year.
- IUSG is significantly larger than QTJL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTJL is classified as alternative, while IUSG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QTJL follows a structured outcome strategy; IUSG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IUSG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IUSG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTJL | IUSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $30.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +36.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.5% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.26% | 15.83% |
| Max drawdown | -33.40% | -32.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTJL and IUSG
Explore further