Screener
QTR vs RYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- QTR costs 0.35% less per year.
- RYLD is significantly larger than QTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTR follows a volatility strategy strategy; RYLD uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, QTR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTR | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 17.74% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | volatility strategy | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.8% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | +8.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.14% | 10.66% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -41.52% |
Similar to QTR and RYLD
Explore further