Screener
QTR vs XYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- QTR costs 0.35% less per year.
- XYLD is significantly larger than QTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTR follows a volatility strategy strategy; XYLD uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, QTR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTR | XYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $3.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 17.74% | 10.61% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | volatility strategy | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.8% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | +12.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.14% | 6.55% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -33.46% |
Similar to QTR and XYLD
Explore further