Screener
QVML vs OMFS
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- QVML costs 0.28% less per year.
- QVML is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QVML follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, QVML has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVML | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.11% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $275M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.04% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.85% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -23.52% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVML and OMFS
Explore further