Screener
QVMM vs OMFS
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- QVMM costs 0.24% less per year.
- QVMM follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, QVMM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVMM | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $408M | $275M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.6% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.37% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -24.00% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVMM and OMFS
Explore further