Screener
QVOL vs IGF
Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.43% less per year.
- QVOL is classified as alternative, while IGF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QVOL covers north america markets; IGF covers global.
- QVOL follows a option income strategy; IGF uses index tracking.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVOL | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $10.7B |
| Since | 2026 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -3.24% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVOL and IGF
Explore further