Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

QVOY vs RHRX

Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF

QVOY

Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF

Q3 Asset Management Corporation

Annual cost

1.32%

Fund size

$60M

RHRX

RH Tactical Rotation ETF

Adaptive ETF

Annual cost

1.38%

Fund size

$34M

Key differences

  • QVOY costs 0.06% less per year.
  • QVOY is classified as mixed asset, while RHRX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • QVOY follows a active selection strategy; RHRX uses option income.
  • Over the last 3 years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

QVOYRHRX
Annual cost (TER)1.32%1.38%
Fund size (AUM)$60M$34M
Since20222012
Dividend yield0.52%0.00%
Asset classmixed assetalternative
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1Y+22.6%+39.5%
CAGR 3Y+12.0%+22.4%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.581.09
Volatility 1Y17.44%13.26%
Max drawdown-17.05%-25.33%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to QVOY and RHRX