Screener
RHRX vs QTAC
RH Tactical Rotation ETF vs Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
- RHRX costs 0.40% less per year.
- RHRX follows a option income strategy; QTAC uses multi strategy.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RHRX | QTAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.38% | 1.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $54M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | — |
| Max drawdown | -25.33% | -16.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RHRX and QTAC
Explore further