Screener
QWLD vs URTH
State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.06% less per year.
- URTH is significantly larger than QWLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, URTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QWLD | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $188M | $9.2B |
| Since | 2014 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.76% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.8% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.9% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.81% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -31.89% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QWLD and URTH
Explore further