Screener
QYLD vs BCCC
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF vs Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- QYLD costs 0.15% less per year.
- QYLD is significantly larger than BCCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QYLD | BCCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.3B | $10M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 11.47% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -42.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QYLD and BCCC
Explore further