Screener
RAAX vs HAP
VanEck Real Assets ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.28% less per year.
- RAAX is classified as alternative, while HAP is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RAAX follows a active selection strategy; HAP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RAAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RAAX | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $905M | $316M |
| Since | 2018 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.93% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.4% | +47.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.1% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.0% | +11.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.66% | 14.91% |
| Max drawdown | -33.91% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RAAX and HAP
Explore further