Screener
RECS vs ECON
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF
Key differences
- RECS costs 0.32% less per year.
- RECS is significantly larger than ECON — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RECS covers north america markets; ECON covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, ECON has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ECON has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RECS | ECON | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.4B | $326M |
| Since | 2019 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 1.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | +60.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.1% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.5% | +7.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.92% | 20.32% |
| Max drawdown | -34.29% | -45.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RECS and ECON
Explore further