Screener
RECS vs REMC
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- RECS follows a index tracking strategy; REMC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| RECS | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.4B | — |
| Since | 2019 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.95% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.29% | -6.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RECS and REMC
Explore further