Screener
RIFR vs USRT
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
Key differences
- USRT costs 0.51% less per year.
- USRT is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR covers global markets; USRT covers north america.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; USRT uses index tracking.
- USRT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | USRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.65% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.62 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 13.24% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -44.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and USRT
Explore further