Screener
SETM vs XME
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
Key differences
- XME costs 0.30% less per year.
- XME is significantly larger than SETM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SETM covers global markets; XME covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, XME has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SETM | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $617M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 0.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.8% | +106.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.4% | +38.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +23.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.37% | 34.35% |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -61.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SETM and XME
Explore further