Screener
TURF vs HAP
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- TURF follows a active selection strategy; HAP uses index tracking.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TURF | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $316M |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +46.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.90% |
| Max drawdown | -6.84% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TURF and HAP
Explore further