Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

REVS vs IWS

Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF

REVS

Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF

Columbia Threadneedle

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$284M

IWS

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.23%

Fund size

$14.9B

Key differences

  • IWS is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, REVS has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

REVSIWS
Annual cost (TER)0.19%0.23%
Fund size (AUM)$284M$14.9B
Since20192001
Dividend yield0.97%1.38%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+28.9%+28.0%
CAGR 3Y+19.1%+17.2%
CAGR 5Y+11.7%+8.8%
Sharpe 3Y1.110.88
Volatility 1Y11.62%13.33%
Max drawdown-37.85%-43.83%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to REVS and IWS