Screener
REVS vs MAVF
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Key differences
- REVS costs 0.56% less per year.
- REVS is significantly larger than MAVF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REVS follows a index tracking strategy; MAVF uses active selection.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REVS | MAVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $284M | $91M |
| Since | 2019 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 0.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +38.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.62% | 14.03% |
| Max drawdown | -37.85% | -14.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REVS and MAVF
Explore further