Screener
REW vs IGM
ProShares UltraShort Technology vs iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Key differences
- IGM costs 0.56% less per year.
- IGM is significantly larger than REW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REW follows a inverse strategy; IGM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IGM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REW | IGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $9.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 7.20% | 0.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -61.2% | +55.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | -46.9% | +39.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -39.3% | +21.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -1.17 | 1.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.51% | 20.24% |
| Max drawdown | -99.74% | -40.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REW and IGM
Explore further