Screener
REXC vs SETM
Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF vs Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Key differences
- SETM is significantly larger than REXC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REXC covers north america markets; SETM covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| REXC | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $617M |
| Since | 2026 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +139.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +30.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 44.37% |
| Max drawdown | -16.40% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REXC and SETM
Explore further