Screener
REXC vs METL
Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF vs Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
Key differences
- REXC costs 0.34% less per year.
- METL is significantly larger than REXC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REXC follows a index tracking strategy; METL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| REXC | METL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $95M |
| Since | 2026 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -16.40% | -27.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REXC and METL
Explore further