Screener
RFFC vs ENHI
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.21% less per year.
- RFFC is classified as equity, while ENHI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $11M |
| Since | 2016 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -5.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and ENHI
Explore further