Screener
RFFC vs JUCY
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF
Key differences
- RFFC costs 0.12% less per year.
- JUCY is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFFC is classified as equity, while JUCY is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; JUCY uses multi strategy.
- Over the last 3 years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | JUCY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $234M |
| Since | 2016 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 8.43% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 3.50% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -1.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and JUCY
Explore further