Screener
RFFC vs EDOG
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
Key differences
- RFFC costs 0.12% less per year.
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; EDOG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | EDOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $30M |
| Since | 2016 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 4.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +5.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 15.85% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -44.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and EDOG
Explore further