Screener
RFFC vs OUSA
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs ALPS O'Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF Shares
Key differences
- OUSA is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; OUSA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | OUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $751M |
| Since | 2016 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 1.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +13.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +13.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 9.87% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -33.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and OUSA
Explore further