Screener
RFV vs RSPT
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
Key differences
- RFV costs 0.05% less per year.
- RSPT is significantly larger than RFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFV | RSPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $4.6B |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 0.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.6% | +67.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | +18.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.26% | 21.22% |
| Max drawdown | -52.24% | -33.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFV and RSPT
Explore further