Screener
RHRX vs BTR
RH Tactical Rotation ETF vs Beacon Tactical Risk ETF
Key differences
- BTR costs 0.30% less per year.
- RHRX is classified as alternative, while BTR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- RHRX follows a option income strategy; BTR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RHRX | BTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.38% | 1.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $37M |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.19% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.3% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.30% | 9.77% |
| Max drawdown | -25.33% | -16.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RHRX and BTR
Explore further